Recent pulblication of article Windows Vista is less secure then windows 2000, has really start the war of word and researches. However there is certainly a way around such as define by Michael Kleef in his blog here http://apcmag.com/vista_less_secure_than_2000_researchers.htm, His point has a valid weight, however, microsoft still cannot blame it on Users only?

Also, since Windows 2000 is a server operating and Windows Vista is Desktop, do we really need to worry about those facts? as in report they said Vista is 37% more safe than Windows XP. A desktop is compared with Desktop PC in that. So considering all those facts, I thought Vista is better equipped and is secure. What you think?